Lincolnshire Voice

A good article taken from the Leicestershire blog:

The National Union of Teachers has launched a campaign against the BNP, despite it's General Secretary, Christine Blower, avowing that the NUT is not affiliated to any political party. She admits however that the union has a political fund that will be directed at the BNP, using such doubtful entities as the odious Unite Against Fascism (we have seen the work of their violent thugs many times recently) and Love Music Hate Racism (Bread and Circuses)

A disgusted member of the teaching profession has given us their copy of the NUT magazine for March. Disgusted because they object to their Union engaging in biased politics. Disgusted at their Union using members' money to campaign and promote hate against a particular legal Party, and producing a 4 page pull-out in their magazine to brag about it. Disgusted at NUT affiliating themselves with known violent extremists such as UAF.
NUT members come from a wide spectrum of politics, and the Union is disgracing itself by not respecting that fact.

Weyman Bennett wades in with his contribution, a mish-mash of supposed hate crime in Eastbury and Chelmsley Wood, lifted from the Left-loving, Guardian, conveniently missing out the fact that BNP members do not indulge in that kind of behaviour, and that, as the Guardian article stated: "Indeed, the trend is far from clear cut. Race crime does not always rise when the BNP takes power. The Metropolitan police believes increases could be down to the growing confidence of victims and witnesses to come forward."
Bennett brings up such wastrels as Robert Cottage, Terence Gavan and David Copeland in his quest to prove the BNP are violent. No-one is going to excuse criminals. Of course, no mention is made of Muslim terrorists, who have caused far more damage; nor does he quote any criminals from other Parties, like these Liars, Buggers and Thieves
Are other Parties to be judged and condemned because of a few wrongdoers? If not Mr. Bennett, why not?

Lee Billingham, national organiser of Love Music Hate Racism then bumbles in with his article, asserting that the BNP vote in the North-West, and Yorkshire and Humberside elections last year had fallen. Mr. Billingham, votes for all the Parties fell, less people are voting! Surely you've read the concerns about voter apathy?

He goes on to boast that LMHR initiatives were warmly welcomed by students - who do tend to veer towards the left, by and large - and brags that 20,000 youngsters attended the LMHR festival in Stoke in 2009. Well, they would, young people have been brainwashed by trashy pop culture, so it's no surprise that they flock to a concert banging the stuff out! But that's what they go for, not the message.

Nick Lowles, national co-ordinator of Hate not Hope then warns about the possibility of the BNP running Barking and Dagenham Council, saying that it would be 'a nightmare for teachers'. Why would it, if the teachers were good ones doing their job properly? Which is to give children - all the children in the Borough - a good education. Does it frighten him, and the NUT, to know that the BNP will implement high standards, and that they will make a far better job of reversing illiteracy, innumeracy, and bringing back discipline, self-respect, and work ethic? Surely we owe our children, and our future, this.

It would appear (on the surface anyway) that the NUT are out of date. Panicking Labour politicians are scrabbling to climb on the BNP bandwagon as they see their seats sliding away from them in the coming General Election. Margaret Hodge has written to her Barking constituents in a grovelling letter saying that immigration can be 'unsettling for predominantly white and traditional East End families'. Ed Balls admits that 'there are concerns' in his area (Morley and Outwood, Yorkshire) over immigration and avers that there should be a probationary period for immigrants before they can claim benefits. Other Labour MP are doing the same thing (astonishing!).

They're being very racist, aren't they? But we do not wonder why NUT, UAF or LMHR is clamouring to decry them, because they know as well as everyone else that the deeply hypocritical and bigoted Labour members don't mean a word of it. After hugging themselves on 'rubbing the Right's nose in it' via deliberate mass immigration, and having been found out, they'll tell any lie to save their skins, even to pinching BNP policies. So much for the "unaffiliated" NUT, and all their little hangers-on.

This is too true to be funny.

The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of it's releases.

A.
A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B.
A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C.
A billion hours ago our ancestors were Living in the Stone Age.

D.
A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

E.
A billion Pounds ago was only 13 hours and 12 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.

Building Permit Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Income Tax
Unemployment Tax
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Petrol/Diesel Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
(tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Tax
Marriage License Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Local Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago... and our nation was one of the most prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national debt... we had the largest middle class in the world... and mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What happened?
Can you spell 'politicians!'

I hope this goes around the UK atleast 100 times
What the hell happened?????

The answer should be:
"we lost control of our money supply to the International banking elite and therefore are repaying interest on a debt owed many years ago - which will never be paid" Ed

Following on from the quotation in the previous article we now show you a video with Gordon Brown suggesting we need a New World Order. Could Gordon and the Labour Party be controlled by a higher force? We will let you make up your own mind, the author already knows the answer!

Young, Angry and White - Media Misrepresentation

This Friday, 12th. February, Channel 4 are broadcasting a documentary called "Young, Angry and White". It purports to be investigating why young people join the BNP.
The blurb in a TV magazine states:

" By the age of 15, Kieran had already developed strong political views; though clearly bright, he thinks Britain should be populated only by white heterosexuals. Now 19, Kieren believes the BNP is the 'family party' and is mulling over joining their ranks. This film asks -why?"

Here is the journalist, Peter Beard, being interviewed about his film (dated 3rd. February). Note that BNP members would not speak to him, and that in desperation he found Kieren through a girlfriend's cousin; this does not accord with Kieren's account, he says that Beard followed him from a rally. Note that the BNP is mentioned 8 times, while the National Front is mentioned once only. Which might seem natural if Kieran was seriously thinking of joinig the BNP, but...

Kieran is actually the Organiser of the Young National Front; he has attended the NF Remembrance Parade, taken part in a nationalist march 2 years ago - something the BNP haven't done for many years. He felt that the BNP have 'sold out'.
Kieran gave a 'heads-up to the coming documentary on 21st January. A senior National Front member, Tom Linden, congratulated him on appearing in the film, giving away Kieran's standing in the party; when questioned about this the message was deleted.

Between filming and Beard's interview on the 3rd. of this month, Beard would have had serious doubts that this young man was contemplating joining the mainstream BNP and it should have been obvious to any self-respecting journalist that his documentary was fatally skewed.

This is not about Kieran per se; anybody should be able to join the Party of their choice and have their views heard. No, this is about the underhandedness of journalists, aided and abetted by the NUJ, who edit and spin their version to suit their agenda, preying on people's naivety when giving interviews of this kind.
We shall see on Friday how this was spun; I hope that Beard has been fair, but we have seen how the media have twisted facts too often against the BNP to expect much difference here. That, Mr. Beard, is why you couldn't find any BNP people willing to talk to you.
-----------

Quote from Mr Beard:
"But I thought Kieren's story was probably the most compelling, and for me, highlighted a story that I'd heard from lots of other people - possibly in a slightly less articulate way - about how vulnerable people can be drawn towards extreme ideologies like nationalism."

(As i'm a BNP member, my intelligence quotient is reputed to be about 20, so I had to look up nationalism in my Oxford minidictionary. It took me a while to find nationalism but I got there in the end, Ed):

nationalism n. patriotic feeling; policy of national independence.

Maybe people are turning to the BNP because we are just patriotic and feel we have a right to govern ourselves in our own country and not be dictated to by a bunch of unelected bureaucrats from Brussels - just a thought.

I must get back to my too times tables, Ed!

Goodbye to my England, so long my old friend
Your days are numbered, being brought to an end
To be Scottish, Irish or Welsh that’s fine
But don’t say you’re English, that’s way out of line.

The French and the Germans may call themselves such
So may Norwegians, the Swedes and the Dutch
You can say you are Russian or maybe a Dane
But don’t say you’re English ever again.

At Broadcasting House the word is taboo
In Brussels it’s scrapped, in Parliament too
Even schools are affected, staff do as they’re told
They must not teach children about England of old.

Writers like Shakespeare, Milton and Shaw
The pupils don’t learn about them anymore
How about Agincourt, Hastings , Arnhem or Mons ?
When England lost hosts of her very brave sons.

We are not Europeans, how can we be?
Europe is miles away, over the sea
We’re the English from England , let’s all be proud
Stand up and be counted – Shout it out loud!

Let’s tell our Government and Brussels too
We’re proud of our heritage and the Red, White and Blue
Fly the flag of Saint George or the Union Jack
Let the world know – WE WANT OUR ENGLAND BACK!!!!

As from 1st December 2009 Britain no longer exists as a Sovereign Nation,
You be a good EU citizen now!

HOPE not Hate (oh the irony Ed) have sent out this strategy briefing regarding the BNP:

The BNP is likely to contest over 200 parliamentary seats in the General Election and up to 1,000 council seats. The main threat is in Barking & Dagenham, where they could take overall control of the council, and Stoke-on-Trent, where they could become the largest single party – and we fear that Nick Griffin could win the parliamentary seat in Barking.

The HOPE not hate campaign has identified 102 council wards in 31 local authority areas that are at risk from the BNP. Just over half of these risk wards are in just 10 local authority areas. The concentration is even starker when one counts the most at risk wards. All but three of the 25 most at risk wards fall in 10 local authority areas, as do 38 of the 50 most at risk wards.

The high risk local authorities, where the BNP pose a threat in multiple wards, are Barking & Dagenham, Stoke-on-Trent, Thurrock , Nuneaton, Sandwell, Amber Valley, Burnley, Barnsley, Rotherham and Leeds. But there are other areas, such as Wigan, Tameside and Bexley, where the BNP will be pushing strongly for the first time.

However, amidst the BNP threat we have an opportunity to roll them back. Over half of BNP councillors are up for re-election this May. That means that if we can run an effective campaign we can actually remove a large swathe of BNP representation in local government. It is going to be a hard fight but it is one that we can win.

Barking & Dagenham will be our national priority. We simply cannot allow the election of a BNP MP or for them to take control of the council. While we are massively increasing capacity in the local area we will be giving our supporters ways they can help.

To defeat the BNP we have devised our largest and most sophisticated campaign plan to date. It includes:

• Building local networks of activists. Since the European elections we have been investing in Local Organisers who are becoming the backbone of much of our campaign. We recognise the vital important of building local capacity in our key areas, without which we cannot achieve our goals, so over the next few weeks we will be launching several local initiatives to achieve this.

• Telephone canvassing. In February we will telephone canvass as many of our top 50 key wards as possible, with our aim to make at least 50,000 calls. This will be done online, so enabling our supporters across the country to help in these elections, with HOPE not hate telephone parties bringing people together to phone collectively. The Voter ID operation will seek to identify voters who dislike the BNP. We will then build up a relationship with these voters through a series of mailings and leaflets during the spring, which will hopefully increase the likelihood of them voting in May.

• Mobilising women voters. Research has repeatedly emphasised that women are less likely to vote BNP than men. We intend to produce a leaflet aimed specifically at women voters.

• Localised material. We will be producing localised material for all of our key areas, with up to 20 different editions of a HOPE not Hate/Daily Mirror tabloid with articles customised for that local authority area.

• Daily Mirror. The HOPE not hate campaign will again be working closely with the Daily Mirror and for the third year running we will organise a HOPE bus tour. There will also be an 8-page supplement inside the Daily Mirror.

How many of the other parties have to put up with this behaviour?

From the excellent website exposing the sinister common purpose organisation that is taking(has taken?) over all our institutions:

Please spread the word as fast as possible:

cpexposed.com has been taken down by the web hosting company, Hostgator, as the result of a complaint by Common Purpose alleging copyright infringement.

The notice from Common Purpose can be downloaded from here

We are puzzled since all the documentation is in the public domain, and has been for some considerable time.

Maybe this has happened because we recently posted information from Common Purpose’s own website showing the links between the Scottish paedophile James Rennie and the Common Purpose organisation. Are we getting too close to the truth? How many other paedophiles are protected by Common Purpose networks and their secretive Chatham House confidentiality rules?

Spread the word. Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible.

They dont want us knowing who the graduates are do they - wonder why -Ed!

This was posted as a comment which we thought you might like to read on the front page:

Percy Bysshe Shelley,
Song - To the Men of England.

Men of England, wherefore plough
For the lords who lay ye low?
Wherefore weave with toil and care
The rich robes your tyrants wear?

Wherefore feed and clothe and save,
From the cradle to the grave,
Those ungrateful drones who would
Drain your sweat -nay, drink your blood?

Wherefore, Bees of England, forge
Many a weapon, chain, and scourge,
That these stingless drones may spoil
The forced produce of your toil?

Have ye leisure, comfort, calm,
Shelter, food, love's gentle balm?
Or what is it ye buy so dear
With your pain and with your fear?

The seed ye sow another reaps;
The wealth ye find another keeps;
The robes ye weave another wears;
The arms ye forge another bears.

Sow seed, -but let no tyrant reap;
Find wealth, -let no imposter heap;
Weave robes, -let not the idle wear;
Forge arms, in your defence to bear.

Shrink to your cellars, holes, and cells;
In halls ye deck another dwells.
Why shake the chains ye wrought? Ye see
The steel ye tempered glance on ye.

With plough and spade and hoe and loom,
Trace your grave, and build your tomb,
And weave your winding-sheet, till fair
England be your sepulchre!

A patriot sent us this below, linked from here:

From 1st December, as the Lisbon treaty came into force, we are no longer masters in our own house. Our prime minister, as a member of the European Council, is obligated under this new treaty to promote the aims and objectives of the European Union, over and above those of the UK, and is bound by the rules of the Union.

Of course, this will make no immediate difference. It simply renders de jure what has been de facto for several decades, but the coming into force of the treaty marks an important symbolic turning point. We are no longer an independent country, de jure. Our prime minister and his government are now working for an alien government, based in Brussels.

In effect, that makes us an occupied country, but the alien creatures that rule us most directly are our own. We are "occupied" by our own political élites, who owe their allegiance not to the people who elected them and pay their wages, but to a more powerful, self-appointed élite in Brussels. They are sock-puppets, with less power than the Vichy government of the 1940s.

No longer will we have general elections to select our own government. All that is afforded to us now is the "privilege" of choosing an electoral college, comprised of people we still call Members of Parliament, who then go on to select the British member of the European Council, a man who is there not to represent us or serve our interests, but to participate in our supreme government.

The worst of it is that, in the streets today, nothing will appear to have changed. Everything will look much the same as it did yesterday. In No 10, a man by the name of Gordon Brown will still be calling himself prime minister. In the Houses of Parliament, there will still be MPs and peers, and the Union Jack will adorn the building.

But everything is different. We are a satellite state of the Greater European Empire, ruled by a supreme government in Brussels. And things will stay different until we have regained our freedom. Until then, as I remarked before, we owe this government neither loyalty nor obedience. It is not our government. It is theirs. It is our enemy.