Lincolnshire Voice

Let's put the seniors in jail and the criminals in a nursing home. This way the seniors would have access to showers, hobbies and walks.
They'd receive unlimited free prescriptions, dental and medical treatment, wheel chairs etc and they'd receive money instead of paying it out.
They would have constant video monitoring, so they could be helped instantly, if they fell, or needed assistance.
Bedding would be washed twice a week, and all clothing would be ironed and returned to them. A guard would check on them every 20 minutes and bring their meals and snacks to their cell.
They would have family visits in a suite built for that purpose.
They would have access to a library, weight room, spiritual counselling, pool and education.
Simple clothing, shoes, slippers, PJ's and legal aid would be free, on request..
Private, secure rooms for all, with an exercise outdoor yard, with gardens.
Each senior could have a PC, a TV, radio and daily phone calls.
There would be a board of directors to hear complaints, and the guards would have a code of conduct that would be strictly adhered to.

The "criminals" would get cold food, be left all alone and unsupervised.
Lights off at 8pm, and showers once a week.
Live in a tiny room and pay £900.00 per month and have no hope of ever getting out.
Justice for all we say.

And think about these below:
------------------------------------
COWS
Is it just me, or does anyone else find it amazing that during the mad cow epidemic our government could track a single cow, born in Bourne almost three years ago, right to the stall where she slept in the county of Lincolnshire?
And, they even tracked her calves to their stalls.
But they are unable to locate 125,000 (quite a bit more now, Ed) illegal immigrants wandering around our country. Maybe we should give each of them a cow.
---------------------------------------------------------------

THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION (think that will mean English Constitution, Ed)

They keep talking about drafting a Constitution for Iraq ...
Why don't we just give them ours? It was drawn up by a lot of really smart guys, it has worked for centuries and we're not using it anymore.

---------------------------------------------------------------

THE 10 COMMANDMENTS

The real reason that we can't have the Ten Commandments posted in a courthouse or Parliament, is this -

You cannot post 'Thou Shalt Not Steal', 'Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery' and 'Thou Shall Not Lie' in a building full of lawyers, judges and politicians ..... It creates a hostile work environment.

---------------------------------------------------------------
So; Think about this ... If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone -- YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!

It is time for us grumpy old folk of Britain to speak up!

It now appears that the excellent private intelligence officer Edward Harle, AKA Chris Story has been got at, probably because he got too close to the truth. Whilst his own website (under World Reports link on homepage) states that he died from a short illness, people who know what he wrote about suspect foul play. Indeed shortly before his death he wrote "We now have proof that the CIA/MI6/Obama/Bush/Cheney issued an assassination order against this Editor."

For followers of his articles will know, he uncovered massive corruption within the US intelligence power, led by George W Bush Snr, presidents like Clinton and latterly Obama along with many other high ranking officials. His exposure of the financial terrorism engulfing the world, naming names (Tony Blair/Bilderbergs etc) and opposition to the EU was well known by many. He proved beyond doubt that the EU organisation was/is illegal and argued for Britains immediate withdrawal. He opposed the war in Afghanistan which he argued was more about the supply of illegal narcotics to the Bush crime syndicate, who literally controlled the US military. He wrote several books on the subjects, including The New Underworld Order and The European Union Collective.

The editor was priviledged to be able to hear him speak last year, a brief glimpse is above. Mr Story even said at this meeting in London that what he did was "dangerous work." A brave patriot.

People may remember the case of Mr Ian Tomlinson who was walking back from work one evening and got caught up in the G20 protests in London. Unarmed Mr Tomlinson, who had his hands in his pockets and was walking away from the police line, was viciously struck from behind with a baton and pushed to the ground by PC SIMON HARWOOD. The resulting injuries were enough to kill Mr Tomlinson.

PC Harwood has been cleared of any convictions due to Mr Patel (who has previous cases against him) giving evidence which has subsequently been contradicted by 2 experts. Therefore the CPS have declared their will be no trial. The family of Mr Tomlinson rightly suggest its a big cover up.

Make up your own mind:

We keep warning the public that the EU has the constitution of a dictatorship and the laws of a Police State.

Police now have legal immunity for killing under the EU’s corpus juris.

Read here for more info.

In the last couple of days another four British armed forces personnel have been killed in the futile "war on terror" in Afghanistan. The death toll is mounting and news in one of the national rags today is that we will pull our armed forces out in 2014 - official (we shall see).

Perhaps readers should be aware that our troops are dying for american oil pipe lines and the supply of narcotics to the corrupt US Intelligence power (look up the Bush crime family, which allegedly is blackmailing Obama due to his citizenship status!).

The British National Party were the only ones who dared to raise the issue of the illegal war in Afghanistan and who campaigned in the general election to bring the troops home straight away - something they can be proud of. If the public had listened to our calls, we would have saved many British lives and the many injured casualties that always seem to be forgotten.

This has nothing to do with British interests, but, unfortunately, this will carry on and on with the casualties escalating.

What did you do to stop this SCANDAL?

Wonder if the Daily Express were accused of being racist for printing that article?

George Osbourne (Bilderberg attendee in 2006, 2007, 2008 & 2009) Chancellor of Exchequer

Budget News

- VAT is to be raised from 17.5% to 20%
- £11 billion benefits squeeze
- Capital Gains Tax up
- Retirement age up

Bullingdon Boy George said, "This Budget is needed to deal with our country's debts. This Budget is needed to give confidence to our economy. This is the unavoidable Budget."

More pain is to follow in the autumn spending review when Government departments whose budgets were not ring-fenced face cuts in the order of 25%.

Comment:

So our government, to help businesses, first reduced VAT to 15% (as a sweetener for what was to come) so all products had to be re-priced and re-labelled due to the price difference. They then returned it to 17.5% so retailers had to re-price and label everything again. Yet we now hear news that VAT is going up to 20% so the poor old retailers have to re-price and label everything again - marvellous! How much has this cost businesses?

Meanwhile, the foreign aid budget has been increased to £13billion. More here.

We spend £billions on "global warming," immigration, membership of the corrupt & illegal EU and most importantly the totally immoral war in Afghanistan that costs us £5billion every year and has resulted in 300 deaths of British forces personnel.

Did YOU vote for them?

Below is an article from the Stop Common Purpose website which is on the front page of this website under "other links:"

COMMON PURPOSE PHILOSOPHY - COMMUNITARIANISM

Common Purpose is part of the New World Order and sustainable development movement. The main objective of Common Purpose is social control in a collectivist and corporatist society.

The philosophy behind Common Purpose is a strange mixture of Capitalism and Communism called Communitarianism.

Communitarianism - which is difficult to pin down - is a type of Neo-Communism that owes some of its ideas to Gramsci and the Fabians. When Tony B Liar talked about the 'Third Way', he meant Communitarianism.

Communitarianism is a "Big Brother knows best" type of philosophy.

Barack Obama is a Fabian Communitarian, although you will not have heard him use the term during his election campaign. Americans will get a shock when the truth of his hidden agenda becomes known and they find out his real intentions. Bear in mind that Obama is simply a front-man for the New World Order Communitarians.

Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.

If you've despaired of the falling standards in our (former!) country, if you feel the Law, and social attitudes, have turned upside down, please read the following.

What is the Frankfurt School?

Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not happen. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what the reasons were.

On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I, a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ – sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to ‘organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat’) ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.’

This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with, school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to school in Germany. He attended universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was ‘the practical problems of implementing socialism.’

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research. When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas – possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family"

Note: when Cameron talks of change this is what he really means, Ed

Do you recognise the results today from the above list? Do you get scoffed at when you express your concern about them? Well, now you know who the scoffers are: Communists, and those who have been gulled by them.

When you get canvassers calling at your door, show them this article and ask them if they have concerns about the items on that list, and what are they going to do about it?. Don't expect a straight answer from LibLabCon though, they're all in the mire together, all cosying up to their establishment lackeys, the Marxist UAF and Searchlight, who just love to promote the things on the list.

Then try asking the BNP; there's no doubt you'll get a more satisfactory reply

Between 1776-1788, Edward Gibbons published a huge six volume work entitled The History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire. Gibbons' work was scholarly and monumental, as it thoroughly covered a period of history spanning approximately 1,200 years. His goal in producing this study was to precisely catalog the reasons for the rise of the Roman Empire and the factors leading to the decline and fall of the Empire. Gibbons was universally hailed as achieving his objective brilliantly.

But, Gibbons not only created a document which details how and why the Roman Empire rose and fell; he created a document which detailed precisely how a successful and powerful Empire could be subverted and destroyed.

Gibbons listed five basic reasons that the enormous Roman Empire was destroyed:

1) The dramatic increase of divorce undermined the institution of the family.

2) The imposition of higher taxes undermined the economic stability and vitality of the Empire. Taxes were raised to pay for deficit government spending, to pay for food for all in society and to pay for government-sponsored activities of diversion, such as circuses and sports. Interestingly, as the time of the final collapse drew closer, greater emphasis was placed on sports, to divert the attention of the public from the distressing news of massive trouble within the Empire.

3) The drive for personal pleasure had become very intense, even to the point of obsession. Gibbons noted that, at the very end, sports had become more exciting and brutal.

4) People lost their faith, both religiously and in their government. Paganism gave way to Christianity and the efficient Roman Government gave way to chaos and disintegration.

5) Hidden conspirators were working within the government to secretly destroy it. They worked quietly, invisibly and deceitfully; during the entire time they were secretly dismantling the government of the Roman Empire, they publicly proclaimed their unswerving support of it.

Recognize any of the above 5 points occurring in Western societies today?

Speaking in the House of Lords on November 7, 1957 the Earl of Gosford (Conservative) said:

"Her Majesty's Government are fully in agreement with World Government. We agree that this must be the goal and that every step that is humanly possible must be taken to reach that goal."