Lincolnshire Voice

Guest article by Albert Burgess

The Rape of the English Constitution

Before we start this article, it is first necessary for a short explanation of the history of the English legal system as regards to the origins and value of our law.

Our laws come in two basic sorts, those within memory and those outside living memory. Any law older than 1189, when King Richard I (the Lionheart) came to the Throne, is said to be before time of memory (Sir Edward Coke 1628). Any law after this time is said to be made within memory. Prior to 1189, we have knowledge of these laws from before time of memory mainly from the history books and other writers and we call these laws the Common Law or the Custom and Practice of England. Custom is any law which has been in use since times of Greatest Antiquity, with the approval of the people. These laws gain their authority because they are the Custom of the English people. Parliament has no authority to repeal these laws, only the people collectively can do so because it is by the authority of the people that they have been in use for so long. These common laws are the main and original source of our English freedoms. These common laws themselves come under two headings, Those Anglo Saxon laws of King Edward the Confessor, (Alfred’s Law) and those laws from the time of King William I or the Conqueror, 1066 and King Richard I or the Lionheart 1189. For the most part, King William I kept the laws of King Edward the Confessor adding just a few dealing with the preservation of the peace and military matters.

Most of these ancient laws, because they protect our rights and freedoms, are constitutional in spirit. But from time to time, because England has not always had good Kings, we the people have had to restrain the king and force him to reissue these old laws again. King William II, also known as William Rufus, tried to ignore the rule of law, he was killed in a hunting accident, shot through the heart by an arrow which history tells us glanced off a tree. King Henry I was forced to issue his Charter of Liberties in 1100. King John, an evil man, was forced to sign The GREAT CHARTER or Magna Charter in 1215. This was a reissue of the Charter of Liberties 1100. King Stephen was forced to issue his charter 1135, a reissue of the laws of King Edward the Confessor. In 1327, King Edward II was deposed and murdered. In 1628, King Charles I was given the Petition of Right, a demand we be ruled according to our laws. In 1641 he was given the Grand Remonstrance, which he also ignored, so in 1649 we removed his head. In 1688, King James II was ruling outside the law and was forced to flee the country for his life. King William III issued the Bill of Rights 1689, a reissue of our rights and freedoms as guaranteed by our English Common Law. It was not as Parliament claims, a restriction on the authority of the King which remained unchanged. The Charter of Liberties 1100, Magna Charter 1215, the Petition of Rights 1628, and the Bill of Rights 1689 are Major Constitutional Laws which, with the Common Law and Custom, are Higher Law. All higher law is beyond the reach of parliament. Add to these the Acts of Provisors and Praemunire 1351, the 1351 Treason Act, and the 1559 Act of Supremacy, and we have the English Constitution.

England has been the victim of black bloody rape and rape of the worst kind.

Before you can commit rape you need a victim. In this case the victim is English higher law, Common and Constitutional law. How, you ask, can you rape a law? Rape, after all, is a violent crime, or is it always violent? Today we have rape by the use of drugs, not just violence, rape can also be by lies and deceit such as a promise made with no intention of keeping your word. In our case, we are talking of the rape of higher law by deception.

Next, we need to know which higher laws have been raped by deception. First, our forefathers set up Parliament a tri-partite agreement. The House of Commons originate law, the House of Lords accepts, amends or rejects that law and, if accepted, it then goes to the King for the Royal Assent, or not, depending whether the King believes it to be in the best interests of his subjects and the country. Parliament itself is made up by the elected representatives from the boroughs, the House of Lords is made up of the Hereditary Peerage, the Lords Spiritual advise on whether the law conforms to Christian values, and the Law Lords who are Life Peers and sit in the House of Lords in their judicial capacity advise on the legality of proposed legislation. Every Lord is a Peer of the realm and has a letters patent which gives his title and job description which is that he is to sit in the House of Peers and scrutinise legislation on the King’s behalf to ensure that only the legislation which benefits the subject and the country is approved, and to thus act as an advisor to the King.

The legal position of the King.

Kings of England are both hereditary and elected. This means that if the people believe the eldest son of the King is unsuitable to hold this high office, they can and will elect someone they feel to be more suitable to the role of King. This is why, at the Coronation of a new King, a Knight in full armour will ride into Westminster Abbey and throw a gauntlet on the ground and say something like, “Are there any foul and base traitors here who dispute the right of this Prince to be King, If there are, step outside and a time and place will be assigned for us to dispute this in battle.”

Once the King has been anointed and crowned, by custom he is the supreme governor of England. This is why he must give or refuse the Royal Assent. This has always been the case ever since King Alfred the Great refused the authority of the Pope to interfere in his Kingdom, making Alfred supreme governor both of the country and the church. This was put on a semi-formal basis by King Edward III when he issued his Act of Provisors 1351 which makes it an act of high treason to dispose of any English asset to a foreign owner, and his Act of Praemunire 1351 which makes it an act of high treason to impose any foreign law into his Kingdom, for his subjects to be drawn out of his Kingdom to be tried in a foreign court, and for any of his Bishops to excommunicate any of his subjects on the orders of the Pope. This was put on a formal basis by King Henry VIII when he issued his Act of Supremacy of 1534, and it was repeated by Queen Elizabeth I in her Act of Supremacy of 1559.

This rape started after the restoration of King Charles II. Charles had just been handed his father’s throne, and was somewhat indebted to the House of Commons so he did not argue when the Commons told the Lords they could not originate a bill or amend a money bill. The Upper House resisted this for some time but eventually gave way; there is nothing in the English Constitution which allows this assault on the powers of the House of Lords. As a direct result of this 1666 nonsense, the House of Lords accepted that they would not amend a money bill. After the death of Queen Anne in 1714, we inherited a King. King George I did not speak English so, unlike every King or Queen who went before, he did not attend Parliament or Cabinet Meetings. This allowed the politicians a free run. George I signed everything put before him, not knowing what he was signing. King George II was told he should not attend Parliament and Cabinet Meetings by government. This was both unconstitutional and an act of treason by restraining the King from carrying out his constitutional role to supervise legislation, and he spent his life complaining that his ministers were kings in his kingdom. George III fought a twenty year battle with the House of Commons as to where sovereignty lay, with him as the Anointed King, or with the House of Commons. After a speech by Pitt the elder in which he said “instead of the arbitrary power of a Stuart King we must submit to the arbitrary power of the House of the Commons. If this be true what benefit do we derive from the exchange? Tyranny my Lords is detestable in every shape, but none so formidable as where it is exercised by a number of tyrants, My Lords, this is not the fact, this is not the constitution, we have a law of parliament. We have a statute book and the Bill of Rights.”

The King won the vote in the Commons. It was decided that sovereignty lay with the King. This is the legal, constitutional position today. Indeed, that has always been the case. Parliament tells us that the last time the Royal assent was refused was in 1707 by Queen Anne over the militia act. This is untrue. Queen Victoria refused the assent to a bill on homosexuality because it referred to lesbians. She did not believe women would engage in these deviant practices, the bill received the assent only after all references to lesbians had been removed. Queen Victoria also refused bills by putting them on one side and saying the Queen will consider it, and from then it was never seen again. As a result of believing that they could not amend a money bill, the House of Lords rejected the 1909 budget; this made the Prime Minister Asquith present to the House of Lords a bill to prevent them rejecting a bill. When the Lords said they would not give it the assent, Asquith threatened them he would put 500 new peers into the House who would vote it out of existence. Faced with this threat, the Lords caved in and gave it their assent.

Asquith presented the Parliament Act to King Edward VII. King Edward refused the assent on the grounds that it was unconstitutional and removed a protection from his subjects by altering the constitutional role of the House of Lords and restricting them from carrying out the job of rejecting bad legislation. King Edward VII said Asquith would have to go to the country. Asquith went around the country telling the electorate that those nasty Lords would not let them have a pension, when in fact the Lords said nothing of the sort. The reason for rejecting the budget was that the extra tax imposed upon the working man would be more than he could afford on top of the tax he was already paying. Asquith was re-elected and King Edward VII DIED of an illness. When King George V came to the Throne, he was told by a government minister that he would keep all of his prerogatives but may not use any of them unless he has the backing of a government minister. King George V was never due to be king. He had an older brother, Prince Edward, who died of pneumonia. Edward was betrothed to Princess May of Tech. In spite of her name she was an English Princess. May however, was in love with his younger brother Prince George, George also loved May. The death of Prince Edward left the way clear for them to marry. The point is that Prince Edward, as heir to the Throne, would have been taught in depth about the English Constitution. Prince George’s constitutional education would not have been more than rudimentary as he was unlikely to need the knowledge. So when a government minister told him he could not use his prerogatives he was unlikely to believe he was being told anything but the truth, when actually he had just been the victim of an act of high treason. Particularly, as he had just lost his father and in all probability was not thinking too straight. King Edward VIII would have been told the same thing, government by now having neutered both the King and the House of Lords. Edward was, in the end, not King for very long due to being forced illegally to abdicate, The English Constitution and Common Law having no mechanism for changing a King otherwise than by his death. His successor, his younger brother the Duke of York afterwards King George VI , like his father, would not have spent a great deal of time learning the Constitution. His daughter Princess Elizabeth was taught from the age of 12 to 22 years of age by one Henry Marten, a Fabian, and we know The Fabian Society want to destroy all that is good in this Kingdom. So an impressionable young girl was placed in the hands of the anti-Christ; someone we would consider to be a traitor. In the Criminal Law Revision Act 1948, the Labour Government repealed the Act of Provisors thus clearing the way for the wholesale selling of our English assets to foreign buyers who have closed down our manufacturing and fishing industries. In the Criminal Law Act 1967, the Labour Government repealed the Act of Premunire, clearing the way for foreign law to be imposed upon this country to our great discomfort, and the European arrest warrant. The rest, as they say, is history with the King and the House of Lords the victims of acts of treason which prevent them fulfilling their role as protectors of the people, and with a House of Commons with far more traitors and crooks than any conventional company could employ and hope to survive. This United Kingdom, this England is well down the road to extinction. Each and every time our ministers sign an EU Treaty, they are handing more and more of this country’s sovereignty to a foreign power the EU a clear act of high treason.

Last week patriots from across Lincolnshire and beyond attended a very interesting talk by Roger Hayes, Chairman of the British Constitution Group, regarding the lawful bank and The Alternative Monetary System. We have posted below videos which hopefully explains this in a little more detail.

Suffice to say, there were many sceptical people prior to the talk, but some were a lot more optimistic following the presentation. Many blunt questions were asked and answered well. As Roger said, "they may build walls in our way but we have the bulldozers to knock them down."

One thing is for sure, this country and the world do need a new monetary system or at least one that is controlled by the government who then act for the people (now there's a novel idea!). The people are losing their freedoms and have become debt slaves to the international financiers who act like they can do what ever they please and make money out of thin air (fractional reserve banking basically).

Is the lawful bank and alternative governance the answer and will they work? perhaps we should give it the benefit of the doubt as nothing could be worse than doing nothing - enough is enough! We shall watch this carefully to see what progress can be made.

The Lawful Bank

There is to be a public meeting next Thursday, 26th January at the Kings Head Hotel, 10 Mercer Row, Louth LN11 9JQ from 7pm to 10pm. Guest speaker will be Roger Hayes, (the man who tried to arrest a judge!) Chairman of the British Constitution Group. Anyone who has researched the global elite will know that the international financiers are the cause of the problem. This will be a talk about The Lawful Bank and how it aims to become a real alternative system run by the people for the people. Please attend if you can, admission is FREE. Come and learn the truth, which you wont hear/see in the controlled mainstream media.

More information can be found at http://lawfulbank.com

Please help spread the word.

Guest article by Mike Stuckey

...except moan. You should all know by now that letters and e-mails are being ignored by MP's and the Queen. There are not enough united anti-EU activists, and I use the term 'activists' very loosely, to be of any concern to the unlawful authorities.

We are already living under a Dictatorship, and Traitors and Collaborators have had a hold on the UK and its people for decades now. So, how is it that so many think that merely informing the public will release us and the UK from the EU bondage and rid us of betrayers? There is a multitude of informers, but those who would rid us of the rot are few and far between. Are you not simply informing those who will inform others? where will that get us? Unless those of mettle are to be found and energised - the unlawful authorities have nothing to worry about. Do you see signs of worry in MP's? Is there increased protection for MP's and the Queen who are hardened Traitors? Is 'Common Purpose' disbanding?
Have you heard of any pro-EU officials being harassed or inhibited?
The answer is NO!
Why?
Because we are all talk! and all talk will not get things DONE!
Quote: "The courage of ones convictions". As I say "Doers do, and Talkers don't".
How can we expect others to do what we will not?
Age and infirmity are no excuse when your country is unlawfully controlled by a foreign power, and Traitors and Collaborators are rife. The older ones of us are in the know, and it is our duty to organise a Lawful Rebellion - for the good of all. Patriots don't get old. The love of ones country never ages or dies. And freedom is not just for the young.

You don't need to stop the talk, but if that's all you are prepared to do, then don't be surprised at the continued slip into subservience and the refusal of others to do more than talk, and when it is blatantly obvious that the gurgling - is the sound of the last remnants of our country going down the plug-hole - then remember these words "I told you so".

We were given brain's to think, and bodies to put those thoughts into action. And I have to point-out again that actions - in this case, need to be more than letters and e-mails and meetings etc.
I know that there are those of you who are waiting for the Euro to totally fail, and those who say that it is inevitable that the EU fails because it is not workable. Are you so confident that the EU will fail that you would do nothing and wait to the very last - when it will be too late to properly ACT? Or would you not dare to risk losing your country and your freedoms?

You must ACT. There are many reasons I can give you - why you should ACT now. It is an easy decision for those who have courage, but - for those of faint heart it is an easier decision to merely continue sending letters and e-mails.

If you don't know how to actively inhibit Traitors and Collaborators - then ask me how. If you know - then get to it. This scum have to be scared so that they will cease their activities. It does not involve threats or the intimidation of their families. The Traitors and Collaborators just need to feel uncomfortable and be aware that we know who and what they are (backed-up by a physical presence to show that we are more than just talk). They should then seriously consider the continuation of their Treasonous activities. There are many other ways, and also ways to indirectly make things uncomfortable for them.

Regards,
Mike Stuckey.

NB. This is a circular and is intended to stir some of us into proper action. Some recipients know the necessity for REAL action - and this e-mail is not (wholly) intended for them. It is not meant to offend, but it is meant to be taken seriously.

Thanks to the Angry Cheese for sending us the attached letter to Sir Peter Tapsell MP. If you get chance look at the reply from the Minister of State for Agriculture and Food.

14/11/11

Honesty is the best policy!

Dear Sir Peter,

This is urgent! As the MP for a huge rural area, this matter should trouble you greatly. Our local independent butcher is closing in a couple of weeks’ time; literally for reasons of racism and exploitation. Everyone in the village here is upset by this. The butchers know but are hesitant to speak out. There has been no conflict, they have simply been priced out as traditional meat becomes harder to source and much more expensive while Halal and Shechita meat suppliers continue with their giant confidence trick of dumping more and more cheap, tortured, “sacrificed” meat on us, aided by echoes of the Holocaust and using the very real fear of being accused of “racism” to silence any objections! I call it, wicked!

Please read the links in this letter for information concerning the deceitful retail of Halal and Shechita (Kosher) meat in Britain and across Europe. This is information which all ordinary British and European housewives/consumers badly need to know and have the right to!

In Britain, it concerns tons of meat sold every week as “British” with a Union Jack on it, or with the New Zealand lamb stamp, giving the impression that it is “normal” and “traditional” when it is NOTHING OF THE KIND! This deceit is rampant across the British meat industry, in ASDA, Tesco, Sainsbury’s, the Co-op, etc. This issue is clearly not being tackled responsibly by your government. I would like to know why?

I am most unhappy to have recently discovered, months too late, the fact that the issue of the possible future labelling of ritually slaughtered meat as such, was debated by MEPs in April 2011, just months after another labelling proposal was struck out by the European Union. What happened? Do you know anything about this? Perhaps you could look into this and give me and the other British people your honest views? Conservative MEP Struan Stevenson, representing Scotland in the European Parliament, drafted an amendment to the food information bill calling for kosher meat to be labelled "this product comes from an animal slaughtered by the shechitah method". He has asked for similar labelling for halal meat. Perhaps you could look into this and give me your honest views?

This is not anti-Semitism, and I will greatly resent any such accusation. An article on this uncomfortable subject here is from a Jewish website:

Certain influential individuals in the Jewish and Muslim communities appear to have banded together in order to continue to deceive and mislead the vast majority of British shoppers. Why has the British Government, which claims to be concerned about the rights of the people, allowed this to pass without comment or objection? Please explain what is happening and why? Why is this deceit being allowed? Conspiracy to Defraud is a very serious crime which carries a prison sentence for those found guilty of it. I trust you and you parliamentary colleagues are aware of this?

Why should the unsuspecting and innocent wider population of Britain be burdened in this way by being obliged to continually subsidise the food of religious communities with which they are totally unconnected? Without even being asked? Is this fair?

No, if religious communities want fancy food, let them pay the price like everyone else?

Thanks to apathy, collusion, or whatever it is that is wrong with the British Government at present, which appears to have no brains, guts or backbone anymore, this enormous deception, will not only continue but, is now set to escalate because the repercussions are going to be VERY GRIM INDEED, now that the EU have wiped their hands of it!
See here
and here

Now there is a green light for the religious slaughterers to take over our food industry, AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING: “enough to feed 30 million Europeans each year”... here. This is just one example! There will now be a shift in investment towards more Halal and Shechita (Kosher) meat in Britain and across Europe! The labelling issue has been resolved in the favour of Moslems and Jews, thanks to the anti-Semitic and racism accusations of their lobbyists. Now the investment floodgates are opening.

As the ritual slaughter industry grows, it is dumping more and more cheap slaughtered meat (the hind quarter offcuts which their people will not buy – which can be up to 70% of the carcass) into the meat mainstream and it is being labelled with Union Jacks and tractors and being called “British Meat” but remains unlabelled as to being ritually slaughtered and the cruelty involved in this process. This deception of the British shopper is being aided by most of our disgustingly complicit hyper and super markets, and the innocent, naïve and unsuspecting British consumer is buying vast amounts of this meat in total innocence.

Meanwhile, our traditional slaughter houses are failing miserably and disappearing, and our traditional butchers are rapidly closing, LIKE THE ONE IN MY AREA WHICH HAS BEEN SUPPLYING LOCAL PEOPLE FOR OVER 100 YEARS.

All that talent, expertise and tradition is being lost across Britain, and these are countless thousands of jobs that will not be there for ordinary young people in the future. This is very, very serious!

The massive Muslim and Jewish meat industries have a double whammy because only their own butchers can supply their own people, so this is a very useful monopoly because these religious people do not buy from British butchers. However, the offcuts (half to three quarters of each carcass) which they do not eat are then sold to the mainstream food industry to flood out and undercut our traditional butchers and slaughter men. Can anyone in the Government understand the simple economics of this? An average 8 year old should be able to! It is not rocket science!
See here
and here

It is also highly likely that the closure of smaller butchers and meat suppliers across Britain is being aggravated by the climate change directives from the EU, issued years ago, which dictate modern fridges be purchased over set periods of years to replace older ones which do not reach a perceived “Global Warming” standard. My opinion on this is twofold:

that the research on global warming has been discredited recently due to the falsification and tampering of data at the University of East Anglia (the “hockey stick” data). So is the change to new refrigeration equipment really so urgent as was believe back in the 1990s?

Secondly, when these directives were issued, Britain and Europe were not in the RECESSION/DEPRESSION that we are now unfortunately in. If banks are now hesitant to lend money to small butchers and meat processors to buy this equipment, and if the businesses themselves feel insecure about the future and whether such loans would be burdensome in the current fiscal climate and too difficult to pay off, this is a seriously negative situation for the future of our meat industry. The British Government have a moral duty here and, if it is decided that these changes must go ahead anyway even if unnecessary, should pay for the new equipment, through government grants, etc. so decent small businesses do not go under due to these draconian directives being enforced. Please look into this matter with urgency as we may soon have very few if any small butchers left in Britain. The cards are stacked against them and they are in deep trouble.

I repeat, soon the small independent butcher and slaughterhouse will be gone forever from Britain! This also explains the closure of the cattle markets across Britain and all the jobs lost there, doesn’t it? Shame on you all in Parliament! What a disgrace, how evil of you to allow things to fall to this appalling level for the people who have placed their trust in you.

I predict our wonderful meat industry will be completely gone in the next couple of years and all our meat will have been ritually slaughtered. Eventually, even the pork will have to be dispatched in this hideous way in the future if there are no traditional abattoirs left to do this work!

UNLESS SOME URGENT, HONEST ACTION IS TAKEN NOW!

This trend is highly likely to have a knock-on effect in areas of farming, animal welfare and the increase of battery farming, and mega dairies in the future, in my opinion. The so-called British “Farmers Union” being about as much use to British farmers and British consumers as a chocolate teapot, I believe! Are they in innocence over this situation? Who knows?

Another area of great concern that I would like to draw your attention to, in relation to this great meat confidence trick, is the position of our Sikh population who deserve the same full respect and consideration granted to all other religious groups. You cannot disagree with that! Are you and your Parliamentary colleagues aware that the Sikh religion has a specific and categorical ban on all Halal and Kosher slaughtered meat, and all Sikhs are forbidden to eat it?

The Sikh religion categorises meat as Jhatka – swiftly killed and acceptable to Sikhs , as opposed to Kuttha – where the animals suffer and are sacrificed to God.

Kuttha (Halal and Kosher/ Sechita) is rejected totally by the Sikh religion.

See this reference from here.

What is Jhatka Meat and Why?

Jhatka meat is meat in which the animal has been killed quickly without suffering or religious ritual.

Sikhism, A Complete Introduction, Dr. H.S.Singha & Satwant Kaur, Hemkunt Press We must give the rationale behind prescribing jhatka meat as the approved food for the Sikhs. According to the ancient Aryan Hindu tradition, only such meat as is obtained from an animal which is killed with one stroke of the weapon causing instantaneous death is fit for human consumption. However, with the coming of Islam into India and the Muslim political hegemony, it became a state policy not to permit slaughter of animals for food, in any other manner, except as laid down in the Quran - the kosher meat prepared by slowly severing the main blood artery of the throat of the animal while reciting verses from the Quran. It is done to make slaughter a sacrifice to God and to expiate the sins of the slaughter. Guru Gobind Singh took a rather serious view of this aspect of the whole matter. He, therefore, while permitting flesh to be taken as food repudiated the whole theory of this expiatory sacrifice and the right of ruling Muslims to impose it on the non-Muslims. Accordingly, he made jhatka meat obligatory for those Sikhs who may be interested in taking meat as a part of their food.

Sikhs and Sikhism, Dr. I.J.Singh, Manohar Publishers. And one semitic practice clearly rejected in the Sikh code of conduct is eating flesh of an animal cooked in ritualistic manner; this would mean kosher and halal meat.

The Sikh Rehat Maryada (The Official Code of Conduct)

An Amritdhari Khalsa Sikh is not allowed to eat the meat of an animal slaughtered the Muslim way.

In Punjabi the word "Kuttha" specifically means meat prepared according to the Muslim ritual slaughter.

Punjabi-English Dictionary, Punjabi University, Dept. of Punjabi Lexicography, Published Dec. 1994. "Kuttha: meat of animal or fowl slaughtered slowly as prescribed by Islamic law."

Punjabi English Dictionary, Singh Bros., Amritsar "Kuttha: Tortured, killed according to Mohammedan law."

The passing-off of masses of meat from ritual slaughter, unlabelled, into the meat retail mainstream renders almost any meat from British butchers or supermarket butchery departments unacceptable to our Sikh population, many of whom have been forced to become vegetarian because of this contrived vaguery. This is an extremely unfair situation, very disrespectful and very wrong, isn’t it! The Sikhs are being let down by the government, aren’t they?

What a shameful mess this all is. How dare the practitioners of foreign and cruel practices be given such unfair advantage over our own decent and traditional meat industry workers?

Why are some religious groups in Britain being given preference and advantage over others?

Sir Peter, You will find there are many video clips on the Web showing Halal and Shechita meat production, many are very gruesome. I hope you have the courage and stomach to view some so you are aware of my and many others’ concerns in this area.

And this is an example of typical whitewash of the meat industry, I believe: here PAGE 31, meat processing described in general terms, it is misleading, mentions the closure of abattoirs – but not the real reason why. Many pretty picture postcard-type photos of cute cows and calves, etc. to mislead us all into thinking all is well in the British meat industry. It does not discuss animal welfare at all, or the changes in slaughter techniques, or the great distress caused by longer travelling distances for the unfortunate animals which is another knock on affect of the closure of the small abattoirs around the country and the “consolidation” this article describes.

Yours sincerely,

----------------

Here are the replies, first from Sir Peter Tapsell MP for Louth and Horncastle (click on image to enlarge)

and from Jim Plaice Minister of State for Agriculture and Food.

This minister is enacting foreign laws which is an act of sedition as it is subverting our own constitution!

Meanwhile, here is what is happening in the real world as local butchers continue to close:

Here are the results of the polls on the Vote For It website (link on homepage) as they currently stand. You won't find these results in the mainstream media but I'm sure you will agree with them!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you feel Parliament has done a good job representing YOU

No: 95.2%

Yes: 4.8%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We the British people DO NOT wish to be part of the EU
Agree: 100%

Disagree: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people demand a referendum on the EU

Yes: 93.8%

No: 6.3%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people wish to Cease all EU funding immediately

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British People demand a full criminal investigation for treason be opened immediately

Yes: 97.4%

No: 2.6%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people offer our full support to any policeman who arrests senior officials whilst investigating this case

Yes: 96.8%

No: 3.2%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call for the Bank of England to be abolished

Yes: 90.5%

No: 9.5%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call for a full public audit of the Bank of England

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call for the complete ban on Common Purpose Training techniques in the UK

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call for the sacking of all Government Employees who are Common Purpose Graduates

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call for the charity status of Common Purpose to be removed

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call an end to hostile action in Iraq and to bring our troops home immediately

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people say

No to The New World Order: 100%

Yes to The New World Order: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British people call for the sacking and immediate Treason charges brought to any member of government who has put the interests of the New World Order above that of the British people

Yes: 100%

No: 0%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We the British People DO NOT wish to join a one world currency

I Agree: 100%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't like these stats? Then cast a vote!!!
Want to see another poll? Drop us a line

Dear Peter,

I listened to your broadcast the day before yesterday on wind farms and the gentleman talking in support of wind farms - trying to support the unsupportable. His argument was shot full of holes, some of the main ones being:-

1) majority of people support wind farms

Where was this survey done - the centre of London? City people will never be cursed by wind turbines and therefore are unlikely to be against them. Try coming to the Lincolnshire Wolds where peoples' lives, enviroment and house prices are being directly impacted by these monstrous, totally useless machines. With few exceptions they are 100% against wind turbines. What would Londoner's reaction be if the government announced that wind turbines were to be erected in every park in London? Would they then be so pro?

2) power from turbines and long term plans for more

This man's statistics, the government's and the actual truth for both power supplied and wind farm future are miles apart. This man claims that 3421 British wind farms provide electrical power for well over 2 million homes - about 7.5%. The government's claim is for 5%. In reality it is under 2%

This man claims that we are "about half way there to the number of wind farms that will eventually be installed". The government has given a pledge to the EU that 45% of our power will come from wind turbines. As we are actually only producing for less than 2%, to meet the government's target we will need to install about 25 times nore wind turbines than we already have. - another 85000 wind turbines

3) wind turbines are quiet and have no effect on local house owners

Tell that to the house wife living at Wainfleet. They suffer grinding noises, like a washing machine 24 hours per day, seven days a week - even louder when the blades are not turning. Their dining room suffers constant 'shadow flicker' as the blades from the nearest turbine as they cut across the sunshine. The arrival of the turbines has produced a 30% drop in their house value. All this and the authorities have the temerity to claim that there is no impact on local housing.

4) wind power is free, efficient, has very small effect on household bills

Wind power is not free, it costs about 14 p per unit compared to nuclear power generated electricity of 5p per unit. It is not efficient, hardly ever working to maximum efficiency and not working at all for 10% to 15% of the time. It is very, very unreliable - in the bitter cold of December 2010, the coldest winter we have had for many years, wind turbines did not move at all due to there being no wind. The total output for the UK at that time is reputed to be just 30KW - enough to heat just 10 3KW electric kettles. If wind power is so great, why did the Victorians drop it like a hot brick as soon as they had invented steam power? If wind power is so good why aren't all of oue big ships driven by sail? Instead of finding new ways to generate power. We seem to have gone overboard for a technology that was abandoned 150 years ago.

5) wind power is helping to save our planet from world warming

What nonsense. Since the installation of the world's first wind turbine up to all of the world's turbines today, the total saving in CO2 gases was completely nullified by just four days of the Icelandic volcanic eruption. With over 200 active volcanoes in the world the positive effect of wind farms on reducing CO" is about effective as a tea spoon of suagr poured into the North sea

6) chronic fuel poverty or French nuclear powered electricity

As wind power takes over more of our supply, either the government (ie our money) will have to constantly increase it's subsidies - producing chronic fuel poverty or wind power will have to fight , in an open market, for it's share of the business. If you were an electricity distribution company and under pressure to increase profits, where your single biggest expense is raw electricity, what would you buy? British wind electricity at 14 p per unit or French nuclear electricity at 5p per unit.? The answer is obvious which would make our wind farms redundant and our countryside will have been destroyed for nothing.

In addition if British wind electricity continues to be subsidised our power costs will escalate through the roof. This will make our industry even less competitive and much more manufacture will move off shore making our out of work situation much worse. (The Far East is far too canny to go in for such wild cat schemes as wind powered electricity generation)

7) wind turbines and their adverse effect on wild life

Wildlife comes at the bottom of the heap in financial matters and therefore little has been said about them so far. So we have glossed over the deaths of bats and large birds such as swans, geese, herons, owls and hawks etc. However, it has now been revealed that wind turbines are having an impact on our fish stocks and therefore the incomes of many people and of Britian itself. Apparantly North Sea wind turbines are being erected where there are shallow seas. These, however, are the breeding grounds for North Sea fish which, disturbed by the vibrations of the turbines, are failing to breed.

When oh when will our governments (not mine, Ed!) admit that they have made a huge booboo in opting for wind farms?
RENEWABLES - YES
WIND FARMS - ABSOLUTELY, DEFINITELY NO

Malcolm Bouchier

Looks like a couple of those "Domestic Extremists" here

Patriots from Lincolnshire attended a semi-traditional bonfire night in order to show their resilience against government tyranny whilst having a decent nights entertainment. This was also to rebel against the lack of public fireworks displays as organisers fear breaching "health and safety" legislation, the law(????) and insurance purposes (hasn't the Frankfurt School worked well). What happened to common sense and the British spirit of old - atleast it was evident here!

Mr Ed starting camp fire

I'm sure I can smell food round here

Now we're cooking

Main fire started now

Traditionally cooked Lincolnshire mushy peas, served with homemade mint sauce

Not so traditionally cooked Lincolnshire sausages - bit of a cheat we know

Er, that's Mr Eds first attempt at homebrew - only half teaspoon of sugar in bottle next time! Bonfire toffee in background. There was a toast to Guy Fawkes

Here is what many people wish for the EU

What, no referendum, oh yes that's democracy and here is what we think of it!

Burn baby burn

That's it my boy

Good lad shove it in where it belongs!

... and for good measure

eeee it's a sparkler - where's the gloves for elf n safety?

Let the fireworks begin

It is a privilege to know such decent folk - Always the Few

A couple of patriots from Lincolnshire attended a very interesting meeting held in Leeds last week to hear Norman Scarth speak about his experience in Arnley gaol. Suffice to say Norman was as usual in good spirits, pleased to see everyone and showing great determination to continue his fight against the system. This is the same system that has tried to deny him his freedom, sanity and even his life.

Norman mentioned that he was denied his medication early on in his "stay," stamps and paper were also confiscated etc. As time went by he was treated a little better by the prison guards at the lower level. Norman said that those with a sense of humanity never rose above a certain "rank" and those at the top of the prison system were not very nice. He mentioned to us all that prisons are not the holiday camps that people on the outside are led to believe. It was mentioned that the media report that prisoners are allowed to watch colour tv, with Norman continuing "I believe that is a form of punishment - why would I want to watch their drivel! (or words to that effect)"

Norman said that when he is at home he likes to sit up in bed and read or think about things, which he couldn't do because the second bunk was quite low above his bottom bunk. Norman, on his own in the cell and being of true British fighting spirit later put a table up against the bunk beds and climbed onto the top bunk so he could sit up! Can you believe this - an 85 year old man climbing onto a table to get on a high level bed - brilliant - all you 70 yr olds take note

He delighted the crowd with his stories and one which stuck out against many was when he said that when he was able to he used to go to the stores to purchase sugar and then became known as the Sugar Baron of the wing. It was also pleasing to hear him say that news of our demonstrations got back to him in prison.

Norman also spoke about the rioting and what he felt was behind it. Almost identical to our article here, he basically said he believed it was pre-planned and used to get a gullible public to ask for further increased police powers. This followed in the wake of the Ian Tomlinson case. You can view a video of that incident here,

It was great to see people from all over the country come at very short notice and especially good to see a growing number of people helping to resist. There was much good news on court cases and history is being made with reasserting our rights - something the establishment wish us to forget about.

One further comment we would like to make is the fact that some people who went to visit Norman had to give photographic i.d (which I believe is usual nowadays) but were also asked for their thumb/hand to be scanned - a bit like biometric i.d. As one person rightly commented "they are just building up their databases." Everyone of us needs to stop and challenge this loss of our own identity.

Post Meeting
Below is part of an email we received from Norman:
To those who could not make it to the Leeds Meeting last evening (Tuesday). The general feeling was that it was brilliant - but Oh So Few! Several people came from far afield, but Leeds & Bradford people were indeed very few.
Henry V before Agincourt comes to mind, "We Few, we Happy Few, we Band of Brothers - for he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother: be he ne'er so vile, this day shall gentle his condition, & gentlemen in England now abed, shall feel themselves accurs'd they were not here, & hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks who fought with us upon St. Crispin's Day!"

From
An escaped convict!

Subsequent to this there was a demonstration held on Thursday 29th in north Leeds including a call for the sadistic Judge Jonathan Rose to resign. Many patriots were there with video cameras to film the occasion. We are told there was a heavy police presence in the area, however, it was not for Norman and his friends. Readers may be interested to know that it was the jewish new year and the police were there to protect jewish interests (from whom?). One wonders how much this cost and who was footing the bill - I think we all know.

On the bus into Leeds

Hello Mr driver

Do I look like Tom Cruise in these shades?

Outside Armley Prison (on left)

Say cheese

..and another

Battle bus suitably decorated

Back on the bus driving through Leeds Centre, letting everyone know who Norman is!

At Leeds War Memorial

This lady on the megaphone was very good

Under video surveillance?

Mixing with the locals, note bus parked outside Radisson

Close up of poster

What a great Banner, Norman WILL like it

Force4Justice

Security keeping guard

Educating the Police - they were fine

Normans fallen friends

and dropping the loonies back off at the asylum

This demonstration was quite a unique experience with upto 50 people in attendance over the day. You might think this is a low number, but considering it was very last minute it was a good turnout and we sure made one big impression. The Police were in attendance and kept an eye on us to make sure we weren't "going to riot" and I believe we made an impression on them. Many people kept asking them to look at this and that website, they were polite when they took our Lincolnshire Voice leaflet and at the War memorial they gave us permission to put the poster up next to the memorial itself (which was over a barrier). Many local people stopped and spoke to us and it was especially pleasing to see young people taking an interest. Obviously there were many who wanted to listen to their ipods and stay in the comfort zone, but between us we put out over 200 leaflets in Leeds Centre.

This is Lawful Rebellion and this is what is needed every weekend in every Town and City. Once we have achieved the numbers, this is when we can stop the elite. We don't want rioters, we must use peaceful lawful rebellion, that way the Police will be on our side as opposed to us when they get their "orders."

The pen is mightier than the sword.

Public concern for Norman Scarth at the war memorial in Leeds, UK.

Please spread far and wide that the case in the matter of Scarth v HMP Leeds reconvenes for a full trial on Thursday 25 August 2011, after the hearing on the 18th, where with the Writ of Habeas Corpus was Ordered to be serviced by the Court in full Public view on HMP Leeds and also the Ministry of Justice was to be notified.

Be there on Thursday 25 August 2011 at the Royal Courts of Justice on the Strand in London to help a friend and be part of history in the making
See http://justicefornormanscarth.wordpress.com/ for more details.