Lincolnshire Voice

Treason - that was the word on the agenda at the latest North Kesteven Group meeting said Cllr Mike Clayton, the local group Organiser. After opening the meeting and the usual introductions to around 30 guests, Mike first spoke about the run up to the general election. There were a series of newspaper articles shown to the audience showing the biased nature of the media and how they portrayed the party and the brave candidates who stood up. After initial reporting, he said things improved and at times treated us fairly so the publicity was quite good locally with various newspapers wanting to speak to us about our policies. Unfortunately there were also the usual letters from the Unions, church representatives and the Lincoln (former) MP Gilian Merron (lab) who continually attacked us, prompting a reply from Mike regarding her expenses claiming for her second home, whilst some pensioners were denied their pension, ignored and forgotten about (thats because the old folk can remember the way it was, Ed).

Mike spoke about being the only candidate out of 6 who wasn't asked to take part in a Hustings debate at a church in Sleaford, which he only discovered by seeing the article on the Sleaford Standard website on the evening prior to polling day. There was also another one he later heard about at Branston "Community College" that he wasnt invited to. Not to be outdone it was mentioned that Rev West was denied the chance to speak in Lincoln at one Hustings debate and Julia Green was denied a platform in Louth & Horncastle constituency.

Rev West told the audience (to much laughter!) that he was invited to a Church husting and then the invite was withdrawn on the grounds "...not that they were against free speech but just that they disagreed with what I said..." Commenting after the meeting Rev said "Well there we are: what hope for the education system and its A* levels."

There was some positive news that Malcolm Porter did get invited to speak in Market Rasen for the Gainsborough Constituency and performed well, having an anti-eu and Afghanistan stance. It was all very grown up and no problems at all - how a democracy is supposed to work!

Geoff Dickens then spoke at length about the Party nationally and mentioned that there were some financial issues, which will hopefully be resolved and he is now one of three people on the new scrutiny committee. He invited questions from the audience, which were answered honestly. After several complaints about the Central Office appeal letters, there was a show of hands and 95% of the audience agreed they wanted no more. Both Geoff and Mike said that anyone not wanting them should write a letter to Central Office and/or press the unsubscribe button to their emails. This will save the party funds and will stop people getting annoyed.

After a very brief break, we had our guest speaker for the night, Mr Albert Burgess, a retired policeman who gave us an English history lesson going from Alfred the Great up to the present era. He explained the lies being spread about the Law and showed us that Treason and Sedition had been committed to subvert our English Constitution in 1972 under the Heath regime. He showed beyond doubt that the EU was an illegal entity and should be struck out accordingly. You can see a video of him above which was recorded at another meeting.

All in all a somewhat rushed but very interesting meeting.

People may remember the case of Mr Ian Tomlinson who was walking back from work one evening and got caught up in the G20 protests in London. Unarmed Mr Tomlinson, who had his hands in his pockets and was walking away from the police line, was viciously struck from behind with a baton and pushed to the ground by PC SIMON HARWOOD. The resulting injuries were enough to kill Mr Tomlinson.

PC Harwood has been cleared of any convictions due to Mr Patel (who has previous cases against him) giving evidence which has subsequently been contradicted by 2 experts. Therefore the CPS have declared their will be no trial. The family of Mr Tomlinson rightly suggest its a big cover up.

Make up your own mind:

We keep warning the public that the EU has the constitution of a dictatorship and the laws of a Police State.

Police now have legal immunity for killing under the EU’s corpus juris.

Read here for more info.

Below is an article from the Stop Common Purpose website which is on the front page of this website under "other links:"

COMMON PURPOSE PHILOSOPHY - COMMUNITARIANISM

Common Purpose is part of the New World Order and sustainable development movement. The main objective of Common Purpose is social control in a collectivist and corporatist society.

The philosophy behind Common Purpose is a strange mixture of Capitalism and Communism called Communitarianism.

Communitarianism - which is difficult to pin down - is a type of Neo-Communism that owes some of its ideas to Gramsci and the Fabians. When Tony B Liar talked about the 'Third Way', he meant Communitarianism.

Communitarianism is a "Big Brother knows best" type of philosophy.

Barack Obama is a Fabian Communitarian, although you will not have heard him use the term during his election campaign. Americans will get a shock when the truth of his hidden agenda becomes known and they find out his real intentions. Bear in mind that Obama is simply a front-man for the New World Order Communitarians.

Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.

If you've despaired of the falling standards in our (former!) country, if you feel the Law, and social attitudes, have turned upside down, please read the following.

What is the Frankfurt School?

Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not happen. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what the reasons were.

On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I, a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ – sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to ‘organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat’) ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.’

This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with, school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to school in Germany. He attended universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was ‘the practical problems of implementing socialism.’

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research. When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas – possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family"

Note: when Cameron talks of change this is what he really means, Ed

Do you recognise the results today from the above list? Do you get scoffed at when you express your concern about them? Well, now you know who the scoffers are: Communists, and those who have been gulled by them.

When you get canvassers calling at your door, show them this article and ask them if they have concerns about the items on that list, and what are they going to do about it?. Don't expect a straight answer from LibLabCon though, they're all in the mire together, all cosying up to their establishment lackeys, the Marxist UAF and Searchlight, who just love to promote the things on the list.

Then try asking the BNP; there's no doubt you'll get a more satisfactory reply

New Prime Minister David Cameron

"....demonstrate in government a new progressive partnership..."
"..Liberal Conservative government can work together.... and common purpose..."

New Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg

"....united by a common purpose by a job we want to do together for the next 5 years..."
Mr Clegg said there was "a huge overlap, a shared agenda and a common purpose between the two parties".

Are we working out that this is what the elite controllers have wanted all the time as we head to the post democratic era? You might like to consider why they have said that there will be a fixed 5 year term for parliament - did the public get to vote on this issue? Sounds like the public have been "dictated" to!

If you look closely you may see the strings pulling the puppets! If you wish to find out who the puppet masters are we suggest you follow the money trail.

The show continues...

Postscript

and another one:

Earlier, ministers said the new cabinet got "straight down to business" with Education Secretary Michael Gove saying there was a "sense of common purpose".

Following on from the quotation in the previous article we now show you a video with Gordon Brown suggesting we need a New World Order. Could Gordon and the Labour Party be controlled by a higher force? We will let you make up your own mind, the author already knows the answer!

Yet more evidence of the Police State we now live in can be found on the link here, showing how councils have the power to enter your property without a warrant.

As we've stated previously, councils have had permission to "watch" people without the persons knowledge for some time now. It's ok though, they are looking out for us all as we have to be safe.

Isn't this what the Gestapo used to do?

A patriot sent us this below, linked from here:

From 1st December, as the Lisbon treaty came into force, we are no longer masters in our own house. Our prime minister, as a member of the European Council, is obligated under this new treaty to promote the aims and objectives of the European Union, over and above those of the UK, and is bound by the rules of the Union.

Of course, this will make no immediate difference. It simply renders de jure what has been de facto for several decades, but the coming into force of the treaty marks an important symbolic turning point. We are no longer an independent country, de jure. Our prime minister and his government are now working for an alien government, based in Brussels.

In effect, that makes us an occupied country, but the alien creatures that rule us most directly are our own. We are "occupied" by our own political élites, who owe their allegiance not to the people who elected them and pay their wages, but to a more powerful, self-appointed élite in Brussels. They are sock-puppets, with less power than the Vichy government of the 1940s.

No longer will we have general elections to select our own government. All that is afforded to us now is the "privilege" of choosing an electoral college, comprised of people we still call Members of Parliament, who then go on to select the British member of the European Council, a man who is there not to represent us or serve our interests, but to participate in our supreme government.

The worst of it is that, in the streets today, nothing will appear to have changed. Everything will look much the same as it did yesterday. In No 10, a man by the name of Gordon Brown will still be calling himself prime minister. In the Houses of Parliament, there will still be MPs and peers, and the Union Jack will adorn the building.

But everything is different. We are a satellite state of the Greater European Empire, ruled by a supreme government in Brussels. And things will stay different until we have regained our freedom. Until then, as I remarked before, we owe this government neither loyalty nor obedience. It is not our government. It is theirs. It is our enemy.